:::::::::: 글로벌번역통역센터 ::::::::::
 
 



 
 
> 고객지원센터 > News & Notice
ADMIN 2021. 03. 05.  
LIST  MODIFY  DELETE  WRITE  REPLY 
   제목: What뭩 Really Behind Corporate Promises on Climate Change?


What뭩 Really Behind Corporate Promises on Climate Change?

Many big businesses have not set targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Others have weak goals.

By Peter Eavis and Clifford Krauss
Feb. 22, 2021


For the past several years, BlackRock, the giant investment firm, has cast itself as a champion of the transition to clean energy.

Last month, Laurence D. Fink, BlackRock뭩 chief executive, wrote that the coronavirus pandemic had 밺riven us to confront the global threat of climate change more forcefully, and the company said it wants businesses it invests in to remove as much carbon dioxide from the environment as they emit by 2050 at the latest.

But crucial details were missing from that widely read pledge, including what proportion of the companies BlackRock invests in will be zero-emission businesses in 2050. Setting such a goal and earlier targets would demonstrate the seriousness of the company뭩 commitment and could force all sorts of industries to step up their efforts. On Saturday, in response to questions from The New York Times, a BlackRock spokesman said for the first time that the company뭩 밶mbition was to have 뱊et zero emissions across our entire assets under management by 2050.

As the biggest companies strive to trumpet their environmental activism, the need to match words with deeds is becoming increasingly important.



Household names like Costco and Netflix have not provided emissions reduction targets despite saying they want to reduce their impact on climate change. Others, like the agricultural giant Cargill and the clothing company Levi Strauss, have made commitments but have struggled to cut emissions. Technology companies like Google and Microsoft, which run power-hungry data centers, have slashed emissions, but even they are finding that the technology often doesn뭪 yet exist to carry out their 뱈oonshot objectives.

밳ou can look at a company뭩 website and see their sustainability report and it will look great, said Alberto Carrillo Pineda, a founder of Science Based Targets, a global initiative to assess corporate plans to reduce emissions. 밄ut then when you look at what is behind it, you뭠l see there is not a lot of substance behind those commitments or the commitments are not comprehensive enough.

President Biden is also placing a big emphasis on climate change and has rejoined the Paris agreement. But determining how hard companies are really trying can be very difficult when there are no regulatory standards that require uniform disclosures of important information like emissions.

Institutional Shareholder Services, a firm that advises investors on how to vote on board elections and other corporate matters, uses company data and its own analysis to assess what corporations are doing to reduce emissions. Just over a third of the 500 companies in the S&P 500 stock index have set ambitious targets, it found, while 215 had no target at all. The rest had weak targets.

밫o realize the necessary emission reductions, more ambitious targets urgently need to be set, said Viola Lutz, deputy head of ISS ESG Climate Solutions, an arm of Institutional Shareholder Services. 밢therwise, we project emissions for S&P 500 companies will end up being triple of what they should be in 2050.



There has been some progress by companies that have rigorous targets. In a report last month, Science Based Targets, which was started by the environmental groups and hundreds of businesses brought together by the United Nations, said the 338 large companies around the world for which it had sufficient emissions data collectively reduced their emissions by 25 percent between 2015 and 2019.

Often large companies in the same industry have very different records.

For example, Walmart discloses its targets for emissions reductions and the progress it has made to the Carbon Disclosure Project, including a goal for emissions from its suppliers, and its plan has been vetted by Science Based Targets. But Costco doesn뭪 expect to have commitments to reduce emissions until the end of next year. Costco executives declined to comment.

Netflix is often compared to technology giants like Google and Microsoft. But Netflix has yet to set a target for reducing the emissions caused by its offices, production activities and the computer servers it uses. 밅limate action is important, and we뭠l announce our plans in the spring, which will include targets based on climate science, the company said in a statement.

Slashing emissions is difficult. Businesses must reliably measure how much carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases they are responsible for. Then companies have to find cleaner energy sources without hurting their operations. Where they can뭪 find cleaner substitutes, businesses often pay others to reduce emissions or remove carbon from the atmosphere.

The task gets even harder when companies begin the process of reducing so-called Scope 3 emissions pollution caused by suppliers and customers. At oil companies, for example, Scope 3 would include emissions from cars that use gasoline.

BlackRock, with $8.7 trillion of assets under management, including stakes in many companies, clearly faces a daunting task. The company doesn뭪 directly own most of the shares or bonds it buys it manages them for pension funds, other corporations and individual investors limiting how much climate activism it can pursue. In addition, most of its investment products track indexes like the S&P 500, so it inevitably ends up managing stocks of fossil fuel companies.

Many Wall Street firms have made pledges to get to net zero emissions from their lending and other financial activities but have not made clear whether that goal applies to the stocks and bonds they manage for customers. BlackRock뭩 decision to include all the assets it manages could pressure other financial giants to make similar commitments, but it could rankle fossil fuel industries and their political supporters in Congress.



Later this year, BlackRock is going to announce an interim target for how many of its investments will have achieved, or be on their way to, zero emissions in 2030.

Still, BlackRock is careful about the language it uses when describing what it will do to push businesses in its portfolios to reduce emissions for which it has been criticized by people who want the firm to take a more activist stand. In a recent letter, the company said it was intent on 밿ncreasing the role of votes on shareholder proposals in our stewardship efforts around sustainability.

밫his could mean a lot of things and as always the proof is in the pudding, Ms. Lutz of ISS said.

Ed Sweeney, a company spokesman, said BlackRock had recently voted for a significantly higher number of shareholder proposals aimed at making companies greener compared with previous years. And in a client memo sent Wednesday, the firm said it might vote against directors and management at companies that it determines do not have clear climate disclosures and credible environmental plans.

밯hile we recognize that the transition to net zero is at different stages based on industry and region, through a combination of engagement with management teams and boards of directors and holding companies accountable for insufficient progress through our voting on director elections and shareholder proposals, BlackRock will continue to focus on this important issue, Mr. Sweeney said in an email.

Other companies that have pledged to cut emissions face different challenges, including coordinating with suppliers and partners.

Consider the apparel industry. Much of its contribution to climate change comes from its supply chain. The clothes that Levi Strauss and others put their labels on are often made in factories in places like China, Pakistan and India that remain reliant on coal-fired power plants. The clothes are transported on ships and planes that burn diesel and jet fuel.



Even so, when Levi Strauss rolled out its 2025 climate action strategy three years ago, its chief executive, Chip Bergh, said, 밯e believe it뭩 time for businesses to start playing a larger role in fighting the world뭩 most pressing problems, like climate change.

The company set a Scope 3 emissions target. But Science Based Targets said in January that emissions from Levi뭩 supply chain were not falling and had grown by 13 percent between 2016 and 2019.

Jeffrey Hogue, Levi Strauss뭩 chief sustainability officer, said that calculation was incomplete because the company could not yet take credit for many interventions and investments it has made with suppliers. He said that would happen once the apparel industry decides on a method for calculating the advances suppliers have made in cutting emissions, particularly for factories that sell to multiple companies.

Excerpts articles from The New York Times
LIST  MODIFY  DELETE  WRITE  REPLY 





전체글 목록 2021. 03. 05.  전체글: 835  방문수: 2725014
 공지  정규직,계약직,프리랜서직 모집 
835   State-run organizations to strengthen ESG values 
834   What Warren Buffett Is Buying 
833   Coupang's market value expected to exceed $50 billion
832   Can Clubhouse Move Fast Without Breaking Things?
831   Hyundai Motor's Ioniq 5 is ready for world to kick its tires
830   What뭩 Really Behind Corporate Promises on Climate Change?
829   Korean banking groups at risk of losing governance autonomy
828   Samsung puts AI processor on a memory chip
827   The Auto Industry Bets Its Future on Batteries
826   Naver continues to beat Kakao in fintech
825   Bitcoin Retreats After Weekend Rally to Record of Nearly $50,000
824   The Power Balance Is Shifting in London뭩 Commercial Real Estate
823   Gov't says Google will make improvements for stable services under new law in Korea
822   Moon's 25th set of real estate measures announced
821    GameStop Cheerleader뭩 Videos Draw a Regulator뭩 Attention
820   Will GameStop saga happen in Korea?
819   The Silicon Valley Start-Up That Caused Wall Street Chaos 
818   'Mass rollout of COVID-19 vaccines is just beginning of the end' 
817   What Jeffrey Epstein Did to Earn $158 Million From Leon Black 
816   Korea's economy contracts 1% in 2020 amid pandemic - the worst on-year growth in over 20 years 
815   Auto Safety Agency Faces Calls for Overhaul as Biden Presidency Begins 
814   Is inflation returning with economic rebound? 
813   Behind a Secret Deal Between Google and Facebook 
812   Unemployment Claims Rise Sharply, Showing New Economic Pain 
811   Millions Flock to Telegram and Signal as Fears Grow Over Big Tech 
810   Could Be a Great Year, if Your Business Survives Winter 
809   Hyundai shares shoot up on reports it will be behind the 'Apple car' 
808   US considering adding Alibaba, Tencent to China stock ban: Reuters 
807   KOSPI hits 3,000-point milestone 
806   Asia's outlook for 2021 looks rosy but with important downward risks 
RELOAD VIEW DEL WRITE
1 [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] 28