:::::::::: 글로벌번역통역센터 ::::::::::

> 고객지원센터 > News & Notice
ADMIN 2021. 12. 02.  
   제목: Can Clubhouse Move Fast Without Breaking Things?

Can Clubhouse Move Fast Without Breaking Things?

The 11-month-old audio social network is compelling. It also has some very grown-up problems.

By Kevin Roose
Feb. 25, 2021

A few nights ago, after my weekly trip to the grocery store, I sat in my car glued to Clubhouse, the invitation-only social audio app.

While my ice cream thawed in the trunk, I dropped in on a room where Tom Green, the former MTV shock comedian and star of 밊reddy Got Fingered, was debating the ethics of artificial intelligence with a group of computer scientists and Deadmau5, the famous Canadian D.J.

When that was over, I headed to a room called NYU Girls Roasting Tech Guys. There, I listened to college students playing a dating game in which contestants were given 30 seconds of stage time to try to seduce someone else in the audience.

And after a few rounds of that, I joined a room called the Cotton Club, in which users changed their avatars to black-and-white portraits and pretended to be patrons of a 1920s-style speakeasy, complete with jazz soundtrack.

Two hours later, my ice cream fully liquefied, I emerged from the car with the feeling that I had just experienced something special. It was all fascinating, surprising and a little surreal, like peeking into the windows of interesting strangers houses. And it gave me a flashback to a similar euphoria I felt years ago, when celebrities and creative weirdos started showing up on Facebook and Twitter.

I뭭e been spending a lot of time on Clubhouse recently, and the parallels to the early, hypergrowth days of those earlier-generation social networks are uncanny. The 11-month-old app뭩 popularity it has more than 10 million users, and invitations are selling for up to $125 on eBay has set off a mad dash among investors, who have valued the company at $1 billion. Celebrities including Elon Musk, Oprah Winfrey and Joe Rogan have shown up in Clubhouse rooms, adding to the buzz. And the app is spawning competition from Twitter and Facebook, which are experimenting with similar products.

Every successful social network has a life cycle that goes something like: Wow, this app sure is addictive! Look at all the funny and exciting ways people are using it! Oh, look, I can get my news and political commentary here, too! This is going to empower dissidents, promote free speech and topple authoritarian regimes! Hmm, why are trolls and racists getting millions of followers? And where did all these conspiracy theories come from? This platform should really hire some moderators and fix its algorithms. Wow, this place is a cesspool, I뭢 deleting my account.

What뭩 remarkable about Clubhouse is that it seems to be experiencing this entire cycle all at once, during its first year of existence.

I started using Clubhouse last fall. At the time, the app seemed to be dominated by typical early-adopter types tech workers, venture capitalists, digital marketing gurus along with a sizable contingent of Black influencers and a number of 밾eterodox internet figures who mostly used the platform to complain about the mainstream media and go on tedious rants about cancel culture.

From the start, there were signs that Clubhouse was speed-running the platform life cycle. Weeks after launching, it ran into claims that it was allowing harassment and hate speech to proliferate, including large rooms where speakers allegedly made anti-Semitic comments. The start-up scrambled to update its community guidelines and add basic blocking and reporting features, and its founders did the requisite Zuckerbergian apology tour. (밯e unequivocally condemn Anti-Blackness, Anti-Semitism, and all other forms of racism, hate speech and abuse on Clubhouse, read one company blog post in October.)

The company has also faced accusations of mishandling user data, including a Stanford report that found that the company may have routed some data through servers in China, possibly giving the Chinese government access to sensitive user information. (The company pledged to lock down user data and submit to an outside audit of its security practices.) And privacy advocates have balked at the app뭩 aggressive growth practices, which include asking users to upload their entire contact lists in order to send invitations to others.

밠ajor privacy & security concerns, lots of data extraction, use of dark patterns, growth without a clear business model. When will we learn? Elizabeth M. Renieris, the director of the Notre Dame-IBM Tech Ethics Lab, wrote in a tweet this week that compared Clubhouse at this moment to the early days of Facebook.

To be fair, there are some important structural differences between Clubhouse and existing social networks. Unlike Facebook and Twitter, which revolve around central, algorithmically curated feeds, Clubhouse is organized more like Reddit a cluster of topical rooms, moderated by users, with a central 밾allway where users can browse rooms in progress. Clubhouse rooms disappear after they뭨e over, and recording a room is against the rules (although it still happens), which means that 밽oing viral, in the traditional sense, isn뭪 really possible. Users have to be invited to a room뭩 뱒tage to speak, and moderators can easily boot unruly or disruptive speakers, so there뭩 less risk of a civilized discussion뭩 being hijacked by trolls. And Clubhouse doesn뭪 have ads, which reduces the risk of profit-seeking mischief.

But there are still plenty of similarities. Like other social networks, Clubhouse has a number of 밺iscovery features and aggressive growth-hacking tactics meant to draw new users deeper into the app, including algorithmic recommendations and personalized push alerts, and a list of suggested users to follow. Those features, combined with Clubhouse뭩 ability to form private and semiprivate rooms with thousands of people in them, create some of the same bad incentives and opportunities for abuse that have hurt other platforms.

The app뭩 reputation for lax moderation has also attracted a number of people who have been barred by other social networks, including figures associated with QAnon, Stop the Steal and other extremist groups.

Clubhouse has also become a home for people who are disillusioned with social media censorship and critical of various gatekeepers. Attacking The New York Times, in particular, has become something of an obsession among Clubhouse addicts for reasons that would take another full column to explain. (A room called, in part, How to Destroy the NYT ran for many hours, drawing thousands of listeners.)

It has also drawn scrutiny from governments. Dissidents in Thailand and Russia have been using the app to discuss government corruption and document human rights abuses. And the Chinese government banned the app this month, presumably after discovering that residents of mainland China were using Clubhouse to have long and free-flowing conversations with people in Taiwan and Hong Kong outside the grasp of censors.

But before I get tagged as a Clubhouse hater, let me sound a note of optimism. I actually like Clubhouse, and think its core technological innovation an easy way to create live, participatory audio experiences is a genuinely useful one. Most rooms I뭭e been in are civil and well moderated, and if you scroll past the megapopular rooms filled with celebrities and clout-chasers, you can find some truly fascinating stuff.

In the past few weeks, I뭭e listened to a Clubhouse room of Black doctors and nurses discussing their experiences of racism in medicine, and a room where a prominent psychologist led a workshop on mourning and grief. I뭭e lurked in Korean karaoke contests, heard energy experts debating nuclear power and hosted civilized conversations about the media. The other night, after sampling a few dozen Clubhouse rooms, I fell asleep to the sounds of the lullaby club, a nightly Clubhouse gathering of musicians who sing songs to help one another fall asleep.

The ability to spontaneously drop in and out of rooms like these, and toggle between passive listening and active speaking, is part of what makes Clubhouse so compelling, and so different from listening to podcasts or attending a Zoom webinar. There뭩 also a refreshing randomness to Clubhouse that makes it more interesting than social networks where every piece of content is algorithmically tailored to your exact interests. (As Nicholas Quah wrote in Vulture, 밫here is something that feels alluringly new about being able to slide between various pop-up communities you didn뭪 intentionally seek out.)

Granted, a pandemic that traps people inside their homes and starves them of social connection is an ideal environment for introducing a new social app, and Clubhouse may lose some users once they뭨e vaccinated and back to I.R.L. socializing.

In addition, Clubhouse, which is invitation-only and currently limited to iOS users, still has the benefit of being small enough to manage. As the app opens its gates wider, it will need to scale its moderation efforts, or risk turning into the Parler of audio a place so lawless that only hyperpartisans and professional grifters want to spend time there.

There is also the looming threat of competition from the giants, which could cut into Clubhouse뭩 growth. Twitter뭩 group audio chat feature, Spaces, launched this month, and Facebook is reportedly working on its own Clubhouse-like product.

Excerpts articles from The New York Times

전체글 목록 2021. 12. 02.  전체글: 954  방문수: 2936024
 공지  정규직,계약직,프리랜서직 모집 
832   How Climate Policy Will Change in 2021
831   World-Dominating Superstar Firms Get Bigger, Techier, and More Chinese 
830   Bottom Drops Out of the Red-Hot Market for Electric Vehicle Start-Ups 
829   GS Retail eyes new acquisition to bolster online business
828   BioNTech to Build Covid-19 Vaccine Facility in Singapore By 2023
827   The Lithium Gold Rush: Inside the Race to Power Electric Vehicles
826   Warren Buffett Wants to Make You Happier, Smarter and Richer 
825   Europe's economy is expected to shrink while the U.S.뭩 grows. 
824   Tesla Makes Money (Including From Selling Cars) 
823   Slow vaccination may hamper economic recovery 
822   Korea to strengthen monitoring of cryptocurrencies 
821   JPMorgan Warns of Bitcoin Weakness as Futures Get Liquidated 
820   SK Telecom launches 5G-based disinfection robot 
819   Citibank to exit retail banking in 13 markets including Korea 
818   Archegos Ripples Through Banks Lucrative Hedge Fund Units 
817   Union Loss May Bring New Phase of Campaign Against Amazon 
816   IMF revises up Korea's GDP growth forecast to 3.6% on robust exports 
815   A K-Shaped Recovery, This Time on a Global Scale 
814   Upbit operator Dunamu expected to go public on NYSE 
813   Technology After the Pandemic 
812   Will Samsung Electronics post earnings surprise in Q1? 
811   Banks Face Billions in Losses as a Bet on ViacomCBS and Other Stocks Goes Awry 
810   Celltrion's founder Seo officially walks away 
809   JPMorgan, Binance still tapped as potential buyers of Bithumb 
808   Market value of cryptocurrencies in Korea spikes tenfold over 3 years 
807   China뭩 Jaded Techies Find a Hero in Elon Musk 
806   First Day of Trading as Gaming Booms 
805   Tax hikes set to be on table amid rising debts 
804   Lessons From a Year of Pandemic Spending 
803   State-run organizations to strengthen ESG values 
[1] [2] [3] 4 [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] 32